View Full Version : What is wrong with today's liberalism???????
Hillbilly
December 12th, 2005, 13:13
As a mental exercise, let's list the problem's with today's liberalism. 1st on my list, is a contemptable attempt at eliminating personal resposibility.
What is your biggest gripe, with liberals??????????
Lars
December 12th, 2005, 18:04
I have no idea why anyone should gripe about liberals, since they are not in power. There is plenty to gripe about, but that has been caused by those in power and they all claim to be conservatives, even if few of their policies should be considered truly conservatives.
I guess one of the newest "conservative" virtues is to lie about being a conservative.
Cowboy
February 13th, 2006, 19:34
My complaint with librals are they support anybody who wants to distroy this country. Look how they support the terrorists. My real question for them is if they hate america so much then why dont they leave?
Fatboy51
February 13th, 2006, 22:46
The reason they gripe about Liberals is to draw attention away from this inept Administration. What with Libby, Delay, Abramoff, Huricane Katrina, invading the wrong country, Osami Bin Forgotten, Randy Cunningscam, and now the CIA,NSA says there was no credible threat against Library Tower in LA or as Bush called it Liberty Tower.
Cowboy
February 13th, 2006, 23:57
Hillbilly, Fatboy just made a good example of what you said lolz. As for Katrina the problems was due to a corrupt Mayor and Governor. As far as I can remember the are democrats. As for what country to invade we invaded the right countries Iraq & Afghanistan and in my openion we need to nuke Iran too. As for Ben Laden,we had three chances to take him but your boy Billy turnned him away Fatboy. Funny thing is you Libs have no issues to run on so all you can do is bash Bush. :rofl: And to be honest all Ive ever seen a libral want to do is take money from the working man via tax hikes and give it to some fat bum on welfare. And the public is finally seeing that.
Fatboy51
February 14th, 2006, 01:59
Another talking point neocon. Most of the blame for Katrina has been shifted to the DHS as a result of Grand Jury investigation. Bush invaded a country with no connection to Osama, Clinton was not in power on 9/11 Bush was and is, he has had five (5) years to get those responsible and how many have been brought to justice? By the way its Bin not Ben.
As far as giving money to people who need it, that's better than giving it to big corporations as a reward for helping elect an inept administration. If Bush was doing a half way desent job he would not be getting "bashed" but then again you are still bashing Clinton, so I guess one must consider the source. After Abramoff, Delay, Libby, Cunningham, I think the left might have somthing to run on. This aministration can even cover anything up, talk about inept! By the way the attackers were from Saudi Arabia.
Jimbo
February 16th, 2006, 22:03
....Clinton was not in power on 9/11 Bush was and is,....
Nice dancing around the subject there Fatboy. Bush was in power on 09-11-01, as you say, but Bill Clinton was offered Bin Laden on a silver plate years earlier, when he **WAS** in power. I guess it's easier to Blame Bush for something, than to face the fact that Billy Boy Clinton could have prevented 9-11, instead of leaving the mess for the next guy to clean up.
Chiefwhatdahey
February 17th, 2006, 01:02
Whatever gaffs the republicans have done whether they be real or imagined pales in comparison to modern liberalism, from Bill and Hillary's misadventures to wacko special interest groups and rounding it out with the hate America bunch. I hope there is a viable third party candidate with good strong conservitive AMERICAN (not yelling) values out there cuz this cat is probably going to sit 08 out if my choices are what is being showcased today, these assholes on both sides make me want to puke :angry:
Cowboy
February 20th, 2006, 10:42
....Clinton was not in power on 9/11 Bush was and is,....
Nice dancing around the subject there Fatboy. Bush was in power on 09-11-01, as you say, but Bill Clinton was offered Bin Laden on a silver plate years earlier, when he **WAS** in power. I guess it's easier to Blame Bush for something, than to face the fact that Billy Boy Clinton could have prevented 9-11, instead of leaving the mess for the next guy to clean up.
Thats all these socialist librals know how to do is dance around. They take from one group and give to another. And they like to call ya "Neocon" when they have nothing to fire back at ya. :rofl:
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.